The Anatomy of Fear

From Signal to Story: How Horror Films Build Fear

Hover over bats to preview, click to descend

Bat 1. Sources of Fear
Bat 2. The Build up
Bat 3. Terror Spikes
Bat 4. Fear Transitions
Bat 5. Signal Impact
Bat 6. Most Potent Cues
Bat 7. Ratings vs. Fear
Bat 8. Horror Recipes
Bat 9. Archives
Explore the Terror Below

Prologue

Project Snapshot

We turned raw screenplays into quantifiable dread. Using AI analysis, we parsed structure, tagged horror signals, and scored emotions to reveal the data behind the scare.

129 Screenplays

IMSDb horror collection, deduplicated and QC’d.

9,760 Scenes Parsed

Splitting script chunks by heading and context.

11,204 Signals Detected

Keywords spanning atmosphere, threat, and psyche.

207 Lexicon Entries

Categorized into audio, visual, pace, and threat families.

What Is a Signal?

A signal is a lexical cue associated with fear. We organize these into six families:

Audio: scream, silence, music. Sound cues that create atmosphere or shock through auditory elements.

Visual: dark, blood, shadow. Visual elements that set mood or show visceral imagery.

Pace: sudden, rapid, silence. Terms that indicate tempo, rhythm, or abrupt changes in pacing.

Threat: knife, danger, violence. Direct dangers, weapons, or explicit threats to characters.

Setting: night, isolated, abandoned. Environmental cues that establish location and atmosphere.

Psyche: dread, trapped, panic. Psychological states, emotions, and mental distress.

We measure not just frequency, but effectiveness: do these words actually spike the fear score?

Throughout the visualizations below, we use these signal families to reveal patterns in horror storytelling: which families generate the most fear, how signals build tension across a film's runtime, which signals are most effective, and how different films combine families to create their unique horror recipes.

IMDB & Audience Reception

Does technical horror craftsmanship equal better movies? We correlate our calculated metrics (fear peaks, signal efficiency) against IMDB audience scores.

In Scene 7, we ask: Is there a formula for success, or do story and character outweigh raw technical dread?

Navigating the Narrative

Eight interactive scenes reveal the mechanics of horror. 1-3: How fear flows, builds, and spikes. 4: The grammar of transitions (Calm to Panic). 5-6: Which specific words hurt the most. 7-8: Recipes for success and film comparisons.

Methodology

Parsing: Scripts were chunked by scene headings. AI Analysis: GPT-4o extracted structured JSON: character stats, lexicon hits, and emotional scoring (Fear, Tension, Sentiment).

AI Output Structure
{
  "heading": "INT. ASYLUM - NIGHT",
  "signals": { "audio": "scream", "setting": "dark" },
  "scores": { "fear": 0.85, "tension": 0.70 }
}

Scoring Metrics: Fear, tension, and sentiment are normalized to scales of 0 to 1, where 0 represents calm and 1 represents maximum intensity. Signals are detected when horror lexicon terms appear in the scene text, and we analyze how their presence correlates with spikes in fear and tension scores to measure effectiveness. Throughout the visualizations below, higher scores indicate stronger emotional impact.

Fear vs. Tension: Fear captures sudden shocks; tension measures slow burning suspense. GPT-4o generates these normalized scores by analyzing each scene's screenplay content, horror signals, and emotional cues.

Scene 1 - Signal Intake

The Blood Flow of Horror

This visualization maps how signal families (left) branch into specific terms (right). Stream thickness shows frequency across all films; node brightness shows fear impact.

400

How to Read This

Interact: Use the slider to filter signals by frequency. Hover over nodes or streams to see exact counts and impact scores.

Interpret:
Left Side: Signal families (Audio, Visual, Pace, Threat, Setting, Psyche).
Right Side: Individual signals like "scream," "night," or "blood."
Stream Thickness: Frequency across all films (e.g., "night" appears in many scenes).
Node Brightness: Fear impact when the signal appears (e.g., "scream" spikes fear even if rare).

Insight: Atmospheric signals like "night" appear frequently but generate lower fear per occurrence. Visceral signals like "blood" and "scream" appear less often but create stronger fear spikes. Effective horror blends both: atmospheric signals maintain baseline tension, while powerful signals deploy at key moments for maximum impact.

Scene 2 - Vital Signs

Heartbeat of Terror

This visualization tracks fear intensity (0-1) across a film's runtime, scene by scene. Skull markers highlight peak terror moments (fear > 0.70); the BPM counter shows average fear as a pulse rate. Compare individual films or view the average to see different pacing strategies.

Scene 3 - The Graveyard

Mapping the Spikes

This visualization maps when fear and tension spikes occur across each film's runtime. Each film gets its own row; tombstones mark fear spikes (fear > 0.40) and lanterns mark tension spikes (tension > 0.40), revealing where terror hits and how spikes cluster.

How to Read This

Interact: Use the toggle buttons to show fear, tension, or both spike types. Click any tombstone or lantern for details. Use "Reset View" to return to the full timeline.

Interpret:
Each Row: One film's runtime (left = beginning, right = end).
Tombstones: Sudden shock moments.
Lanterns: Suspense build moments.
Clusters: Multiple markers close together indicate intense sequences.
Overlap: When tombstones and lanterns appear together, the film combines shock and suspense for maximum impact.

Insight: Jump scares (tombstones alone) fade fast. True dread comes when lanterns surround or precede a tombstone, with tension priming the audience before the fear spike hits. The most memorable scares combine sustained tension buildup with sudden fear spikes at the peak moment.

Scene 4 - Fear Matrix

The Ladder of Fear

This visualization reveals how scenes transition between three fear states: Calm, Unease, and Panic. Each cell shows the probability of moving from one state (row) to another (column). The diagonal shows staying in the same state; off-diagonal cells reveal gradual climbs versus sudden jumps.

How to Read This

Interact: Hover over cells to see exact transition probabilities. Darker colors indicate higher likelihood.

Interpret:
Rows: Current state (Calm, Unease, or Panic).
Columns: Next state.
Diagonal: Staying in the same state.
Off-Diagonal: Changing between states.
Color Intensity: Darker = more likely; lighter = less likely.

Insight: Horror has a grammar. Scene transitions prefer gradual climbs (Calm→Unease→Panic) over sudden jumps (Calm→Panic). Once scenes reach Panic, they tend to stay there. This pattern of careful ramp up followed by sustained intensity creates more effective scares than random state changes.

Scene 5 - Signal Autopsy

What Actually Works?

This bubble chart reveals which signals are most effective. Each bubble represents one signal; bubble size shows frequency (how often it appears), and position shows impact (how much fear/tension it generates). Bubbles in the top right are both frequent and impactful, making them "Elite Signals."

View mode
📡 Signal Lab Field Notes

Hover to see crosshairs. Click a bubble for the full dossier.

How to Read This

Interact: Use the dropdown to change what the axes show (Impact, Fear, Tension, or Frequency). Hover over bubbles to see crosshairs and quick stats. Click any bubble to open a detailed dossier with full breakdown.

Interpret:
Bubble Position: Top right = high impact; bottom left = low impact.
Bubble Size: Larger = more frequent signals; smaller = less frequent.
Bubble Color: Red = shock heavy (generates more fear); blue = tension heavy (generates more tension).
Top Right Corner: Signals that are both frequent and impactful (Elite Signals).
Bottom Left Corner: Signals that are rare and generate low impact.

Insight: Common atmospheric signals like dark and night set the mood but generate low fear per occurrence. Rare visceral signals like scream and blood appear less often but create stronger fear spikes when they do. The most effective horror strategy combines widespread atmosphere to maintain baseline tension with selective deployment of powerful triggers at key moments for maximum impact.

Scene 6 - Impact Dripline

Ranked Signal Potency

This visualization ranks all signals by their impact on fear and tension. Each "drip" represents one signal; the length shows impact potency. Use the dropdown to sort by impact or alphabetically, revealing the sharp drop-off between elite and atmospheric signals.

How to Read This

Interact: Use the dropdown to sort by impact or alphabetically. Hover over signals for exact impact scores.

Interpret:
Drip Length: Longer = higher impact; shorter = lower impact.
Left to Right: When sorted by impact, highest (left) to lowest (right).
Steep Curve: Sharp drop-off means only a few signals drive most fear; long tail provides context.
Elite Signals: High impact performers (> 0.50).
Atmospheric Signals: Set mood but generate minimal direct fear.

Insight: Horror follows a power law: a small elite group (scream, blood, kill) drives the majority of fear, while hundreds of atmospheric terms provide context but minimal direct impact. Effective horror relies on strategic repetition of proven triggers rather than scattering dozens of weak signals.

Scene 7 - The Rating Constellation

Does Scary = Good?

Does effective horror translate to higher ratings? Each film appears as a point: horizontal position = horror impact score, vertical position = IMDB rating. Larger points indicate higher ratings.

How to Read This

Interact: Use the dropdown to highlight films. Filter by year or rating range. Hover over points for details.

Interpret:
X-Axis: Horror impact score (signal effectiveness, fear transitions, peak fear).
Y-Axis: IMDB rating (0-10).
Point Size: Larger = higher ratings.
Correlation Line: Positive slope means stronger horror metrics correlate with higher ratings.
Outliers: Films that succeed despite low technical scores (or fail despite high ones).

Insight: Technical horror craftsmanship doesn't guarantee audience acclaim. While some highly rated films cluster in high impact regions, many outliers prove that story, character, and innovation matter just as much as technical execution. The best horror blends craft with creativity.

Scene 8 - Recipe Cards

The Horror Fingerprint

This radar chart shows each film's unique horror recipe across six signal families (Audio, Visual, Pace, Threat, Setting, Psyche) that organize our 207 horror lexicon terms detected in screenplays. Values (0-1) show the proportion from each family. Find films that match your taste.

Normalized balance (0-1) across 6 signal families.

🎯 Find Your Match

Adjust sliders below to set preferences. The 0-1 scale shows relative emphasis: 0 means minimal use of that signal family, 1 means maximum emphasis. We'll recommend films that match your preferences.

How to Read This

Interact: Select a film from the dropdown to see its radar pattern. Use the preference sliders below to set your ideal horror mix, then click "Find My Horror Match" to see recommended films.

Interpret:
Each Axis: Represents one signal family (Audio, Visual, Pace, Threat, Setting, Psyche).
Values (0-1): Show the proportion of the film's lexicon from each family; 1.0 = maximum emphasis.
Shape: The pattern reveals the film's horror strategy.
Spiky Shape: Specialist approach (e.g., Slasher = High Threat, low in other areas).
Round Shape: Generalist approach (balanced across families).

Insight: No single recipe wins. Supernatural films lean on Psyche/Setting; Slashers lean on Pace/Threat. Diversity in the recipe is what keeps the genre alive.

Epilogue

What the Data Whispers

After analyzing 129 horror films, 9,760 scenes, and 11,204 signals, patterns emerge that reveal the architecture of fear.

Three Pillars of Effective Horror

  1. The Power Law: As shown in Scenes 5 and 6, a tiny elite of signals (scream, blood) drives most fear despite appearing less frequently. Atmospheric signals like night and dark appear constantly but generate low fear per occurrence. Effective horror uses atmosphere to maintain baseline tension, then deploys elite signals at key moments.
  2. The Grammar of Pacing: Scenes 2, 3, and 4 reveal that effective horror uses strategic pacing, not constant terror. Most films hover at moderate fear levels (0.3-0.5) with occasional spikes, especially near the end. Films prefer gradual climbs (Calm→Unease→Panic) over sudden jumps, and once in Panic, they tend to stay there.
  3. Strategic Balance: Scene 8 reveals that every film has a unique horror recipe across six signal families. Some films are specialists (one or two dominant families), others are generalists (balanced across families). Scene 7 shows that technical horror craftsmanship doesn't guarantee audience acclaim; the best films blend craft with creativity.

The data whispers: Master the craft, but trust the art. Use metrics to inform your choices, but let creativity pull the trigger.